Prolet Decheva
Biography: Prolet Decheva received a BA in Communication Studies in 2012, a BA in Art History in 2016 and a MA in History of Late Antique and Byzantine Art in 2019 from the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich and has also studied in Udine (2015/16), Bonn (2017) and Rome (2017/18). She is interested in digital archives and digital methods in art history and has worked as a student assistant for the Project “Bibliotheca Palatina – digital”, Heidelberg University Library (2017/18), completed an internship at the Photo Library of the Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz – Max-Planck-Institut (2019) and assisted the project “Premodern Digital Cultural Heritage: Networking Open-Access Image Repositories of Ancient and Medieval Content”, University College Dublin (2021). Between 2016 and 2020 she volunteered for the Verein für Spätantike Archäologie und Byzantinische Kunstgeschichte e.V. in Munich. In 2022 Prolet was a Dumbarton Oaks Summer Fellow in Washington, DC. |
Research: Prolet’s PhD project Personifications of abstract ideas in Late Antique and Middle Byzantine Art is the natural continuation of her MA dissertation topic Ktisis – Kosmesis – Ananeosis. Ausdruck spätantiken Stifterprestiges? in which she analysed three personifications of abstract ideas (“Foundation”, “Embellishment” and “Renewal”)—appearing predominantly on 5th and 6th c. mosaics throughout the Eastern Mediterranean—in relation to Late Antique attitudes towards donations of public buildings and as a Late Antique expression of donors’ prestige. In her current project she explores the phenomenon of abstract personifications as such focusing on their functions in Late Antique and Middle Byzantine visual culture. This is a highly flexible type of personification that differs significantly from the common representations of personified cities or seasons. Devoid of iconographical consistency, such as identifying attributes, these figures can only be identified through an accompanying label. Furthermore, these are not only represented in visual media: they appear, for instance, in philosophical texts, biblical narratives or epigraphical evidence. Thus, only by analysing the relationship between visual and textual sources, while at the same time considering the specific contexts in which they appear, can their intended meanings and functions be properly understood. The longue durée of abstract personifications raises further questions: How did these change over time and why? In order to identify continuities and innovations in wider social, political, and religious contexts Prolet is examining this phenomenon in a longer time span (from Late Antiquity throughout the Middle and Italo-Byzantine periods) and in various visual media (book illumination, mosaics, textile, toreutics, etc.). Her PhD project is being generously funded by an UCD Ad Astra PhD Studentship. |
Keywords: Late Antiquity; Byzantine Art; Iconography; Personifications; Status; Text and Image; Elites; Abstract ideas; Visual Culture; Eastern Mediterranean; Mosaics |
Contact: (opens in a new window)prolet.decheva@ucdconnect.ie |
Supervisor: Dr Sean Leatherbury |
Professional Activities: Publications:
Recent conference papers:
|