ARTICULATION | ENGAGEMENT & ATTRIBUTION | REACH & SIGNIFICANCE |
How clearly is the impact, or potential impact, communicated? |
How have the beneficiaries been engaged with, and what evidence is there that the research contributed to the impact? |
How widespread are the impacts, and how important are they to each beneficiary?1 |
Score: 30% | Score: 30% | Score: 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 The reach and significance of the impact should be judged relative to the academic discipline and the scale of the research.
2 Research Impact can be 'conceptual' or ‘instrumental’. Conceptual impact, for example, might include evidence of having influenced public debate on an issue, or having better informed policymakers, or having enabled wider thinking about cultural issues. On the other hand, instrumental impact includes more direct effects of research, like specific inventions or changes in the law. Plausible evidence is required to justify both types.
Tools and resources to help you plan, capture, communicate and monitor your #ResearchImpact are available in our Research Impact Toolkit.